Feasibility of same-day discharge of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is one of the most common oncologic diseases. Outpatient robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has gained popularity due to its ability to minimize patient costs while maintaining low complication rates. Few studies have analyzed the possibility of performing outpatient RALP specifically in patients undergoing concurrent pelvic lymph node dissections (PLND). METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database (NSQIP), we identified total number of RALP, stratified into inpatient and outpatient groups including those with and without PLND from 2016 to 2021. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and unplanned readmission rates were summarized. Proportions of outpatient procedures were calculated to assess adoption of outpatient protocol. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2021, a total of 58,527 RALP were performed, 3.7% (2142) outpatient and 96.3% inpatient. Altogether, patients undergoing outpatient RALP without PLND were more likely to have hypertension (52.6% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.01). Patients undergoing outpatient RALP without PLND were more likely to have sepsis or urinary tract infections (3.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.04) when compared to outpatient RALP with PLND. Cardiopulmonary, renal, thromboembolic complications, and 30-day events such as unplanned readmission, reoperation rates, and mortality were similar in both groups. However, among multivariate analysis regarding 30-day readmission and complications, there were no significant differences between outpatient RALP with or without PLND. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing outpatient RALP without PLND were more likely to have baseline hypertension and higher rates of postoperative infection, when compared to outpatient RALP with PLND. No significant differences were seen regarding 30-day readmission or complications on multivariate analysis.

Recent trends in the prescription of opioids in the emergency department in patients with urolithiasis.

PURPOSE: Pain management is central in the treatment of urolithiasis. We aimed to estimate the impact of the 2017 Department of Health and Human Services declaration of an opioid crisis on prescribing patterns of opioids and NSAIDs in emergency department visits for urolithiasis. METHODS: The National Health Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) was queried for emergency department visits of adults with a diagnosis of urolithiasis. The association between urolithiasis and narcotic and NSAIDs prescription patterns was evaluated and compared at pre-declaration (2014-2016) to post-declaration (2017-2018) periods. RESULTS: Opioids were prescribed in about 211 million (41.1%) out of 513 million emergency department visits, over a 5-year period. Diagnosis of urolithiasis accounted for 1.9% of the visits (6.0 million). The use of opioids was higher in urolithiasis (82.7%) compared to non-urolithiasis diagnosis (40.3%), as well as the use of multiple opioids per visit (p < 0.01 for all). There was an overall decrease in opioid prescriptions in the post-declaration period, - 4.3% for urolithiasis (p = 0.254) and - 5.6% for non-urolithiasis visits (p < 0.05). A decrease in the use of hydromorphone (- 47.5%. p < 0.001), an increase in the use of morphine (+ 59.7% p = 0.006), and an increase of 'other' opioids (+ 98.8%, p < 0.041), were observed. Opioids combined with NSAIDs comprised 72.6% of the opioid prescriptions and 62.3% of all analgesic prescriptions in visits with urolithiasis diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of opioids when managing urolithiasis decreased 4.3% after the crisis declaration; however, statistically are not different from pre-declaration numbers. Most often, opioids were prescribed with NSAIDs in urolithiasis patients.

Bullseye Technique to Optimize S3 Foramen Access: Applying a Trusted Endourology Technique to Pelvic Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an advanced therapy that stimulates sacral spinal nerves to modulate bladder or bowel dysfunction and is approved for the treatment of overactive bladder, fecal incontinence, and non-obstructive urinary retention. Prior to implantation, a successful trial period must be performed via percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE) or a staged trial to assess treatment efficacy. Ideal lead placement in the S3 foramen is imperative to produce an adequate response and successful outcome. Traditional lead placement with fluoroscopic guidance utilizes the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. In this abstract we describe an additional modification which may aid lead placement. OBJECTIVE: This video demonstrates the bullseye technique to obtain S3 foramen access for optimal lead placement in SNM. METHODS/MATERIAL: Begin the procedure by placing the patient in the prone position. The medial edges of the S3 foramen are marked bilaterally in the AP view followed by a horizontal marking at the level of S3. The pelvis is imaged with live fluoroscopy starting at 0 degrees and then rotating the C-arm to 30 degrees. This rotation allows the "opening up" of the S3 foramen from an ellipsoid to an oval. The surgeon grasps the needle with a Kelly clamp, placing it at the level of the skin approximately 2 cm cephalad from the horizontal marking. Live fluoroscopy is performed to align the needle with the image intensifier to form the bullseye. Once the correct angle is identified, the needle is advanced. The procedure is repeated on the contralateral foramen. RESULTS: The bullseye technique allows quick and predictable access into S3. It can potentially decrease operating time, minimize needle entries in PNE, and allows the surgeon to access S3 while maintaining proper medial orientation. CONCLUSION: The bullseye technique can assist surgeons in obtaining optimal access in SNM and can quickly be integrated into current practices.